A HERMIT'S TALE: Part One

 


General Introduction

I wrote my first short book (THE CAVE OF THE  HEART) in 2005 but only published it  in 2022. It is available HERE on Amazon. At the moment I am writing A Manual for  Novices for Tariqa Eliyahu HaNabi (the  Jewish-Sufi Tariqa I founded in 2022). You can read first drafts of that book HERE .

But there is another text—one that was finished some years ago but is too brief to be issued as a book, and it does not belong as part of the aforementioned book-drafts as it is of a totally different character. This is because it is a personal memoir and not a practical or theoretical manual like the other works.

I am in my early seventies, settled in Safed in Israel as a full time intentional solitary contemplative (a Mitkarev). But I was once a Carmelite monk, converted to Progressive and then Orthodox Judaism, worked decades as a musician and school teacher in UK, Indonesia, and Singapore— and then lost my sense of hearing totally. I am entering a new and third stage in my life....and this autobiography traces the way I got here.

Personally, I am irritated by the existence of this autobiographical text as, by definition,  it is intensively  self focussed. I am an aspiring Jewish-Sufi contemplative, and such mystics are supposed to transcend the ego. As autobiography, it indicates I have very far to go on that Path— and of course that knowledge  hurts my ego.  But I labour to develop equanimity in such matters. I long to “die before I die” and so I shelved the annoying  text until today and hoped it would just go away.

But I keep hearing the voice of one of my greatest teachers (now deceased) telling me “to write my own scripture and tell the story of my life for the benefit of others”. So here it is.

Some parts of it are mindless froth designed to raise a chuckle, some parts of it are purely peripheral entertainment for musicians,teachers, or the spiritually minded; other parts tell the story of a personal journey in and out of tragedy—a transformation that may well be of comfort, and even inspiration for those experiencing disability, loss, or isolation in their own Spiritual Journey. That last statement is the main reason I am lifting it down from the shelf and publishing it online in installments here as “A Hermit’s Tale.” If you are meant to read it....you will find it....may it give you hope and strength.

Nachman Davies

Safed

Adar 2023

A HERMIT'S TALE



PART ONE.  Planted and Transplanted

The journey of spiritual transformation is often concealed when  Providence  is at work.  The route-changes and unexpected diversions, the traffic jams and collisions in our spiritual journeys often reveal their hidden purpose  many years after they have happened, becoming clear to us only when  we make  time for retrospective reflection.

Today, I would call myself  ‘a Jewish Contemplative’.  It took me  many years to see that I had  been on a journey that was designed to produce that realisation. The journey is not over—and never will be— but I am now aware that a vocational metamorphosis was being effected step by step over many years.

I was born to non-religious but nominally Christian parents in north-western England, in Birkenhead on the Wirral, in the early 1950’s. My genetic ancestry is North European, predominantly Welsh & English (with smatterings of German-French-Russian and Sudanese) and though there were family rumours of  Jewish antecedents in the patrilineal line, I have  never had firm evidence of this. 

Most significantly, I was an only child  and my parents allowed me enormous freedom to develop an imaginative interior life from a very early age.  I was a sociable child and joined in all the street games of my childhood friends, but I was equally happy to play at home alone....mostly being a wizard writing spells and potion recipes (in the years before H.Potter!), or as a pioneering spaceman travelling in  my wardrobe). Both of my parents held several jobs down simultaneously in order to survive. My father was thus a “Bird’s Eye frozen-food salesman/Liverpool taxi driver/Oxton Village undertaker” and my mother was a “Dashley’s Meat butcher/ Liverpool Vernon’s pools-entry sorter/Prenton sweet shop assistant”. For them, making ends meet was a never ending struggle, and so I spent  a lot of time  in the house without them while they juggled with the timetables of their multiple jobs.  I also cooked lunch for myself from the age of ten onwards as  they were both out at work.

I think I had already ‘caught’ religion by the age of  six, ostensibly after watching the 1960’s BBC television series Paul of Tarsus starring Patrick Troughton.  The morning after the first  episode was broadcast, I was to be found preaching to the nations: Dressed in full Middle-Eastern-style finery fashioned from the family bed-sheets and towels, in the vestibule of our ‘Coronation Street’ style terraced house— I propped-up my Bible on a wooden pedestal ashtray stand and delivered my prophetic message to anyone who happened to be passing the open front door.   One of my passing congregants was Mrs. Williams the local Lollipop lady. (A Lollipop Man or Lollipop Lady was a part-time  traffic warden at a zebra crossing  near a  school. They stood beside the Belisha beacons and bore huge STOP signs resembling lollipops. Younger readers may need to perform  several google-searches to make  any sense of  that statement. Other readers will now be aware that we are currently in one of the “frothy entertainment” sections of this story).

From that day onwards (and until I moved to Secondary school in my eleventh year) whenever I approached her zebra crossing on Borough Road, she greeted me  affectionately as ‘Paul of Tarsus’.  From this I assumed that my preaching as a six year old had been effective.  Patrick Troughton went on to play ‘Doctor Who’.  I have exchanged the towels for a tallit (prayer shawl) but am otherwise more or less the same deep down. Birkenhead seems to have recovered from the shock of my debut appearance relatively unscathed.  

The house of my childhood was a musty  two-up-two-down Victorian Terrace  in Whitford Road, Higher Tranmere, later declared insanitary and dangerous  to public health and forthwith demolished in the 1990’s.   During my family’s residence there in the 1950’s and 1960’s, there were only five  books in the entire house. Two of them were religious: a Masonic Bible belonging to my father and  kept (in its original and pristine boxed condition) in his  bedside drawer and my own (battered and bruised)  Paul of  Tarsus Bible. Another one of the five was an ancient and  disintegrating edition of the Chambers  Dictionary which had been given to me with great love  by my mother’s brother, Edward Jones.  I read it as though  it were a text book intended to be  read page by page, from cover to cover. That gift contained the  fully-detailed etymological information that many other dictionaries lacked, and it provided me with a precocious vocabulary and much of my  English language knowledge. 

  The remaining two books in the house were kept in a cupboard by the side of the kitchen fireplace, where they kept company with the building’s indigenous silverfish,Whitney blankets, and various hoarded remnants of decaying cloth that  my mother had put  aside for  repairs. The two books were (i) a 19th century collection of Daguerreotype photographs of South  East Asian culture, and (ii) an A1 size volume of indeterminate but considerable age entitled The Naval Battle Plans of Cornelis de Witt (1623-1672). Both books were brought back from the Second World War by my father (who had served in the 8th Army in North Africa) when he was  in Germany for  a ‘clear up’ operation immediately after the Armistice.    Alongside these two books rested a (never displayed) twelve inch diameter pewter plaque of Saint Cecilia, the patron of musicians, playing a portative pipe organ.

  These three items were strangely prophetic as I became  a music teacher and organist and also ended up living in Indonesia with a long-lasting connection to a family of well known Dutch ethnomusicologists. (Greet Heins of Amsterdam was my second gamelan teacher  and her talented daughters, Marleen and Saskia, taught my Frodsham High School students Javanese music and dance with generosity and great kindness. My first Javanese gamelan teacher was  the composer Alec Roth of Preston, who kindly interrupted  a busy schedule  to give me tutorials in Liverpool Lime Street train station cafeteria). The connections between those items in that cupboard and the later parts of my life-story  may seem to be extremely tenuous connections to you, but to me they have always felt like a revelation of Divine playfulness.    

As a pre-teen child, I spent most of my free time devouring the books in the religion, history, and  mythology sections of  Birkenhead’s wonderful  Central Library (built in neo-classical style in 1934).   Thanks to the foresight  of Ms. Pinches, the local historian and senior librarian, I was prematurely admitted to the enormous Adult Library at the age of ten as I had already consumed all the material on those subjects housed in the Juvenile Library.  With the memory of the moment’s excitement undimmed, I can still recall the frisson that accompanied each step that  I made as we walked from the Juvenile Library to the Adult Library: Ms. Pinches led me by the hand, through the magisterial marble and wrought-iron entrance arch, to the polished oak and brass-hinged gate where, with measured ceremonial formality, she introduced me to the beaming counter staff as an honorary member.  I was issued with four cardboard  adult tickets and ipso facto the  Doors of Academia were  opened to me. I walked  or bicycled there each week or fortnight after school, taking my little pile of study materials  home  in a canvas haversack to be  hungrily devoured in solitude at home.

At Primary School things  were not  quite so idyllic. Though he was a very kind and able educator, Mr. Oliver—the Headmaster of  Woodchurch Road Primary School—did not regard my choice of studies and their obsessive intensity quite so positively.  He summoned my parents to the school to tell them that unless I ‘got my head out  of Ancient Greek mythology and started to focus on improving my appalling Mathematics, I would be nothing but a source  of worry for them’.   I cried a lot about this— justifiably in a way, as my mathematical and logical skills are atrocious to this day—but I was rescued by Mr. Donald Clutton who was the visionary class teacher of  Woodchurch Road’s class 4B.  He  inspired me to read and  write English Literature, and he encouraged me  to  study history with the passion he had rightly identified in the midst of my wayward daydreaming. Donald Clutton bumped into me by chance on Thurstaston Common thirty years later and despite the  passage  of so many years, he recognised me  immediately and even greeted his former ten year old pupil by name.   He later became  Head of History at Gordonstoun.  May his memory be for  a blessing.

My parents did not attend any church except for weddings, christenings, and funerals, but they gave me the freedom to go wherever I liked, and between the ages of ten and sixteen I had been allowed to discover and attend services and Sunday Schools in: St Catherine’s Church  (Church of England); St Paul’s Church (Scots Presbyterian); Maitland Meeting Hall (Evangelical); and, for one abortive session only, Grange Road  Youth Group (Salvation Army).

 After these early experiments in community membership, I settled for several years (aged ten to fourteen)  in Christ Church, Claughton (Low Church CofE) as a choir member sitting in the choirstall of  Wilfred Owen the war poet. There I was taught musical literacy and  basic keyboard skills by the charismatic organist, Mrs. Dorothy Dearnley. Her inspirational tuition and her passionate performances of Messiaen’s ‘Dieu parmi nous’ on the Church’s Father Willis organ turned me, virtually overnight, into an aspiring musician and composer. Aged ten, and with emerging chutzpah, I wrote to Olivier Messiaen personally to tell him this  and received in return a signed photo, a brochure on the organ of Saint Sulpice, and a sheet music score of  his prayerful and uplifting  motet, ‘O Sacrum Convivium’ .

In the midst of a burgeoning and stormy adolescence, I surprised everyone (except G-d) by concluding my search for a Christian home by becoming a Roman Catholic, setting up a new religious base at St. Joseph’s Church in  North Road, Birkenhead.  The church had a remarkable pipe organ (Two manuals and pedalboard) which was often played by one of the parish priests, Fr. James Molloy, and I was  delighted to be invited  to act as his page-turner during his twice-weekly practice sessions.  On his passing, I inherited his complete organ-works library and, not having a piano or keyboard at home, I was fortunate  enough to be granted permission to practice regularly on the church’s pipe organ myself—something I did every weekday on the way home from school. Armed  with Fr. Molloy’s legacy and a fair amount of zeal, I proceeded to teach myself  to play the organ.

  Fr. Molloy’s library included the principal organ works  of J.S.Bach and Josef Rheinberger. Using the money I earned playing at Church weddings at St. Joseph’s and across the Wirral, I added scores by Charles-Marie Widor, Karg Elert, Louis Vierne, and Flor Peters, together with the slower and blissfully ecstatic movements of  works by Olivier Messiaen.

The many hours of organ-loft observation  that I had spent as a page-turner for both Dorothy Dearnley and Fr. Molloy proved to be valuable free tuition for me, and I served as parish organist at St. Joseph’s Church for the following four years.

 To this day I would claim that playing such  an instrument is one of the  most satisfying performance activities available  to a musician. In the  world of instrumental music, nothing can match the challenge and exhilaration of controlling multiple keyboards, a pedalboard, swell pedals, draw-stops, tabs, manual and foot piston buttons, and written scores simultaneously—the experience is like being composer, conductor, orchestra, and audience at one  and the same time  in each intense moment of performance. 

Music  and spiritual experience often go hand in hand. R.Nachman  of Breslov assures  us  that it can that it can act as a foundation of true  attachment to G-d. and he went  so far  as to claim  ( in Likutey Moharan I:3  and  Likutey Moharan I:54) that it can even lead to  a  level of prophecy. In the  light  of this, it was not accidental that  it was also at St. Joseph’s, at the tender age  of sixteen, that I first discovered the mystical writings of Teresa of Avila and Juan de la Cruz, and simultaneously  began the regular practice  of contemplative  prayer in earnest.

oooOooo

 I set up a personal connection with the Discalced Carmelite Convent in Oxton and began serving Mass there and doing small gardening jobs for the nuns each Saturday morning.  In return, I received  the spiritual encouragement and personal support of Sister Mary Immaculata O.D.C.  She called me ‘her little brother’ in the spiritual life, and we met—on either side of the parlour grille— for a spiritual stock-taking/progress review, several times each year for many years.    

  I had decided when I was child of seven or eight that I wanted to be a vicar (Anglican minister) when  I ‘grew up’ and that original aim was simply transmuted into its Catholic format after my going over to Rome as  an  adolescent.  To the enormous grief of my dear parents, I announced  that I intended to become  a Roman Catholic priest.  My parents would have  preferred it if I had remained CofE and married to continue the family line, but they did not stand in my way and they eventually accepted my decision with love—and so I left home shortly after A levels to become a Discalced Carmelite monk.  I was eighteen: full of self-regarding religious zeal and almost oblivious to the searing pain I was causing them. 

The Order of Discalced Carmelites is an order of friars and nuns whose rule of life originated in the mediaeval Christian hermit community on Mount Carmel near Haifa, a community  which was given its official status  by the giving  of  the  Rule  of St. Albert of Jerusalem in the early thirteenth  century C.E. From that that date onwards it spread throughout Western Europe  until it split into two factions: the  Calced Carmelites and  the Discalced Carmelites. The Discalced [i] branch is the more contemplative and  eremitical of the  two branches and has its form from the hands of two sixteenth century Spaniards of Jewish ancestry: the aforementioned Teresa of Avila and Juan de la Cruz.

 Interestingly, the tradition within the Order claimed that there were also Jewish and Islamic hermit communities living on Carmel who were hermits following the tradition of Elijah the prophet. But I am unaware of any archeological evidence to support this conjecture. To this  day, near the ruins of the original Carmelite monastery at the  seaside base of the mountain, there is  a ‘Cave of Elijah’ which is a place of worship frequented by Jews,Moslems, Druze,and Christians.

Speaking very generally, there are two principal forms of Christian monasticism. Eremitic (individual reclusives living in isolation) and Cenobitic (groups of celibate devotees living,eating,and  working in common).  Three monastic orders combine both forms: the Carthusians,the Camaldolese, and the Discalced Carmelites.   The Discalced Carmelites are communal hermits whose life consists of simple community services recited in church, two separate hours of silent ‘mental prayer’  in common each day, and a great deal of time spent in one’s solitary cell in silent work, study, or contemplation.  Liturgy is simple and spartan. The two hours  of ‘mental prayer’ usually take place in the church with all the  friars  sitting or standing for  each of the  two hours in silent free contemplative prayer.[ii]  Though their emphasis is clearly on contemplative prayer, in recent years the Discalced friars have undertaken a more active ministry as well, but the nuns—to their great credit— have zealously maintained the purely contemplative lifestyle to the present day.

     Looking back on my time as a Carmelite, I can now see that I was too young—in experience as well as  in years—to have realised what I had taken on.  I am ashamed to say that I lacked perseverance and  felt the call of the secular world more than I ought to have  done.  Though I was observant of the temporary vows of poverty, chastity, and obedience  to the letter, I found observance of the  latter two almost unbearably difficult to maintain.   After a few restless but deeply formative years in that Order (in Oxford, and then at Ushaw College Durham) and before taking permanent vows[iii]—I decided to leave the community, and to return to secular life. It came as a shock to Fr. Bede Edwards O.D.C.  who had plans that I should become a historian under his mentorship at the Teresianum in Rome, and to the community who had expected me  to stay for life.

 There is also a part of me  that still views my decision to leave as a shameful rejection of the intimate relationship that was being offered to me.  In recent  years, as I age and  can look back on my life, I can  appreciate just how selfish and short-sighted that decision was. In Christian  monastic circles, Solemn Profession as a monk or nun is regarded as marriage with the  Divine.

 Ditching a Divine  Partner is never  an insignificant matter and it  has far-reaching  consequences.

   When  I  left the  Carmelites in 1976, my Novice-master, Fr. John Bernard Keegan O.D.C. told me that he was absolutely certain that I would one day return to what he believed was my true calling—a dedicated contemplative lifestyle.  He was right.  But it did not happen quite as he might have envisaged it.

oooOooo

During my time as a Carmelite monk two events helped me to see that my technicolour helter-skelter tour through Christianity was only the very beginning of a return journey to my true spiritual home.  The first event was reading a  book entitled “Jesus the Jew” written by Geza Vermes in 1973. The book had been written only a few miles away from the Chilswell Priory (on Boar’s Hill) that was my monastic home and had been donated by the author to our community library. This scholarly book opened up a criticical study of early Christianity which gave  me  a good intellectual shake up on the mythology vs history plane, and it helped to pave the way for me to begin the move out of Christianity.   

The second  event was a providential meeting with a visitor to the monastery: Reform Movement Rabbi, Lionel Blue.  The meeting was highly significant as it led to my conversion to Reform Judaism in 1992  and ultimately to my conversion ki halacha  as an Orthodox Jew in 2016.[iv]  It was also the beginning of a lifelong friendship, and his practical support for my work as a composer and religious writer was unconditional and unfailing.   (It was his advice on publishing this very text that is referred to in the General Introduction above).

My debt to him is beyond measure.

  Lionel’s version of Judaism was never my own, [v] but despite profound and fundamental differences in our conflicting approaches to the halacha, and despite the fact that we eventually ended up on opposite sides of the Orthodox/Progressive religious divide—we were nevertheless in perfect agreement in holding that

  • (i) prayer is a two-way conversation with G-d,
  •  and (ii) that compassion and respectful consideration for others are the hallmarks of the truly righteous in all denominations  or religious groups. 

In 1974, when  we first met, he gave  my group of  Carmelite novices  a lecture on the  Pesach Seder  and when he sang the Ha Lachma Anya with quivering  kavana,  my world stopped and was transformed.  Quite simply: in the deepest conscious level of my soul, I already knew  and recognised what I was hearing, and as the room seemed to fade and give way to another world hidden just behind it, I was given  the first glimpse of my true home.  

It then took me seventeen years to fully accept that Christianity had been my soul’s route back to Judaism and not my final destination—that I had a soul-element that had stood at Sinai and that, for reasons beyond my comprehension, I had to climb back there through many denominational and circumstantial brambles and thickets before my re-incarnated soul’s tikkun would be accomplished.

Those who know me would tell you that I have every respect for religions other than Judaism. I believe (in particular) that the Abrahamic religions possess a Providential diversity: that the acceptance and co-existence of these Faiths  is a Divine challenge  not a "problem".

 When Christian or Moslem friends ask me why I left Christianity I remember that principle. I know it often gives them some pain and disappointment (though it really shouldn’t) but my most simple yet all-embracing answer is:

 “Jesus the Galilean preacher said he came to lead people to “the Father”. I believe that Jesus the Cosmic archetype did just that—and then disappeared from my life,mission accomplished.”

 That both those manifestations of “Jesus” continue to inspire and guide many of my non-Jewish friends does not irk me. It seems to me that they provide an equally valid religious experience to mine, and they have the potential to produce a personally authentic way for them to meet G-d. How the Divine Unity is revealed in religious diversity is beyond my comprehension, but it deserves my awe and respect.

oooOooo

I left the Carmelites and the contemplative lifestyle in 1976. Both my parents died shortly after that date.  After several months of disheartening unemployment (and four weeks of  hard labour as a cowherd in Storeton Hall Farm on the Wirral) I began a degree course in Music and Educational studies at  Hope University Liverpool.  

There I was fortunate to have the composer and professor Stephen  Pratt as my composition tutor and  personal mentor, and the concert pianist, Michael Young, as  my long suffering  piano tutor for four blessed years.

 Michael Young is the only pianist I have ever heard who could  make the piano sound like a legato instrument (in the Berg’s PianoSonata ), and also like a symphony orchestra in full Mahlerian expansiveness.   At my first lesson with him and on hearing that my favourite composer was Mahler, he immediately broke into an electrifying impromptu performance of  memorised extracts from Mahler’s Symphonic works.

 Stephen Pratt was perhaps  the  most gifted educationalist  I have ever encountered. He  was endlessly supportive  and helped me produce my first composition  (entitled ‘SINAI’) which was a setting  of the Sh’ma for vocalist, orchestra, percussion and  a shofar solo—and he inspired me  to go on writing for many years to follow.

In private conversation Stephen Pratt  had declared me  to be a  ‘cultural hermit’ and to expand my experience he (literally) sent me to an Albert Hall Prom Concert on 24 August 1979 that was to change and  re-direct my musical career for ever. He had noted, in my own compositions, certain similarities to the gamelan music of Java, and the Promenade concert in question featured a gamelan performance  by the Akademi Seni Karawitan Indonesia of Surakarta under the direction of Sri Hastanto, coupled with a performance of Messiaen’s Trois Petits Liturgies that featured Jeanne Loriod on ondes martenot under the baton of Simon Rattle.

(Gamelan is South East Asian percussion music performed on large sets of bronze or iron metalophones and gongs. Vocal solos and choruses,bowed and plucked string soloists are sometimes added. The ensemble has no conductor but is “directed” by the  drummer and/or the  bonang or rebab player.)

For me, that concert was Earth Shattering beyond words.

I stood on tip-toe through the entire Gamelan section of that concert, straining to get a view of the performers, utterly paralysed in musical ecstasy and frozen in a trance outside of time on hearing this music for the first time:  and from that day on, I became a gamelan student and teacher.

  After obtaining a B.Ed hons. degree in Liverpool, I turned my energies to the forging of a career in music teaching and educational management. I spent over twenty ferociously workaholic years doing that in Primary and Secondary schools in  UK and in South East Asia—and  made a good and secure living doing so.

I taught the usual spectrum of Western serious and popular  musical genres, and managed  Music departments in Stanney Comprehensive School in Ellesmere Port and then at Frodsham High School near Warrington. My special area of focus became the teaching of Javanese Gamelan in British schools, and this  was the case for the rest of my teaching career.


I was involved in the introduction of Javanese Gamelan into the English National Curriculum in the 1980’s, and my childrens’ Gamelan group from Frodsham High School performed on British television, in the Queen Elizabeth Hall and in the Albert Hall during the national Schools’ Prom in 1984.  The students had built the entire set of instruments themselves and students Jonathan Clark, Sorelle Kane, Alison Kaye, Gary Barlow, Kitty Prisk, Julie Cowin, Penny Argust, and Andrea Julyan[vi] produced new gamelan compositions and lyrics in traditional style to extend  its repertoire. Here are  some of the  beautiful lyrics written by  Sorelle Kane in 1984.

"Seized by the  eyes.  Its pallor taking me  higher. From shining skies eternal. Spread the  Wings of Peace. Penetrate the mist. Like  sun inscribed on shadow. The sharpest point of Talon. Unclasp the Golden secret.  For a glimpse everlasting. My veins run pure with gold. Lift me higher. You carry my soul.  I have at last the key. Then falling...falling...falling........ "[vii]

  

Although I was working in Frodsham which is  near Warrington, I lived some distance away in rural Storeton Village on the Wirral.   After my parent’s death, I had bought a stone-built cottage on a mortgage which I soon realised was totally beyond my means.  Most seriously, I found that I could  not afford to heat the place in winter. The second-hand car in which I commuted to work was on its last legs and I could  no longer afford to run it and pay the utility bills.  It would  seem that Mr Oliver’s concern over my mathematical innumeracy was not so misplaced  after all. To this day it is still my area of particular incompetence.   

In December 1984, one of my fellow teachers at Frodsham spotted an advertisement in the Times Educational Supplement for a teaching post in Jakarta, Indonesia and  joked that it might solve my financial and heating problems in one blow—giving me some hands-on and indigenous gamelan experience into the bargain.

 I appreciated the joke (and her concern) but replied that I was happy in my job and lacked any desire to go abroad.  I was never a keen traveller and have usually settled in one place without leaving  its close environs for years  at a  time, but relocations have  often happened against my will, out of the blue, or by ‘coincidence’.   To me, it has always felt as if there was a 'Pillar of Cloud'  at work.

Moved more by the freezing cold of that December evening in Storeton than by any cultural or career considerations— I applied on impulse for the job in Jakarta and was interviewed in London.  I was woken up a  few days later by a telephone call from Geoffrey Tomlinson, the school’s Principal, offering me the  post—and I surprised myself by accepting.  I was still half asleep at the time and as I put the phone  down it suddenly dawned on me what I had done. I had set a process of enormous change in motion: I was about to leave my much loved native Wirral and go to live  in an unknown country on the other side of the world; in a type of school which was totally beyond my experience. I need not have worried.  Mr Tomlinson turned out to be yet another one of the charismatic teachers I have  been so fortunate to know, and I had the happiest years of my teaching career under his benevolent leadership.

    I moved to South East Asia in 1985  as the principal Music Specialist at the British International School Jakarta  and soon after, I became Director of Music during the ambitious and enormous expansion of that school under Ronald Stones. He was to become my long-term and highly supportive employer as I later moved on to become his Director of Music at the Tanglin Trust School in Singapore where I was responsible for the general music education of thousands of expatriate  children. 

   In both Jakarta and Singapore I was fortunate enough to teach children—from Nursery to A level age—in two educational environments that could only be described as ideal. They deserved that epithet because of good leadership; dedicated and highly competent teaching colleagues; and because the children taught there were totally motivated to enjoy and derive the maximum benefit from a  happy  time at school.   Good schools are always more about people than equipment and facilities. Fulfilled and appreciated staff will always be found  in a classroom of happy children—and  vice versa.

   The students that I taught are the children  I never had, and many of them are still in touch with me to this day. As is so often the case, they don’t realise that they taught me  much more than I ever taught them.

 oooOooo 

If you made it this far...congratulations.  I realise that this part of “A Hermit’s Tale” is purely background and much of it would only interest people who are either Scousers, or personal friends, or musicians........but it was necessary to state much of it if readers are to  make sense of the  more spiritual parts of the  tale which will follow in later installments of the  tale.  Hope you enjoyed reading it.

 

©Nachman Davies

Safed 2023

 

 PART TWO of A HERMIT'S TALE  is HERE

 



ENDNOTES

[i] So called because the ‘barefooted’ branches of monastic orders were newly reformed  and stricter communities, often embracing signs  of religious poverty. In fact the original Discalced Carmelites wore alpurgatas (rough espadrille sandals made of  dried grass-fibres).

[ii] Nevertheless, Juan  de la Cruz recommended that these two hours of what we would call silent hisbodedut were spent in the  fresh air  in a natural environment where possible.

[iii] A Roman Catholic monk or nun usually takes Simple Vows (in a ceremony of Simple Profession) on an annual basis for several years, and then makes a Solemn Profession of  Permanent Vows after which they are considered dedicated for life.  The two states resemble an engagement followed by a  marriage.

[iv] Progressive/Reform Jewish conversions are not recognised by Orthodox religious courts. For Orthodox Jews, the only valid conversions are those conducted “ki-halacha” (according to traditional Jewish Law) by the court of an Orthodox Beis Din.

[v] Orthodox Jews insist that the oral law (halacha) is authoritative and binding. Reform and Progressive Jews frequently make community and individual choices which do not adhere to the traditional codes of Jewish Law or the directives of contemporary Orthodox halachic authorities.

[vi] Under the tutelage  of the Heins sisters, Andrea also performed as principal dancer, taught some of the other dancers herself, and designed and  made many of their costumes.  Jonathan was a creative genius in both the arts and craftsmanship, but sadly died very young.   Julie became  an Anglican minister, Sorelle a gifted poet and  visual artist, Alison became  a professional composer and  a professor of composition at the Royal School of Music, Penny a lawyer.  Kitty and Gary went on to become practical musicians, Gary as leader of the  pop group “Take That” and Kitty as a Gamelan musician and ethnomusicologist to this day.  These were the “builders” of the gamelan, but actually each and  every one of the Frodsham group was a star.

[vii] The 1983 Queen Elizabeth Hall performance  can be viewed  HERE and  the 1984 Albert Hall performance HERE

  

 


Abraham ben Ha Rambam on Creation

This  post is from our  sister website "Jewish Sufis" at the  time  of  year when  we begin  to read the  Torah from the  start again.  It points  out the kind of knowledge that Jewish Sufis aspire to and  contrasts Tariqa Eliyahu's own  authentically Jewish path with that of the more popular  and  widely-known systems of  the  Spanish and Safed School Kabbalah.


Our human understanding can never comprehend G-d, though we  can meet and (in some  sense) know Him in contemplation, experience, and by His gift. 

In his commentary on Bereishit, Rabbenu Abraham ben HaRambam (1186-1237)

 writes:

 

"And G-d saw all that He had made and behold it was very Good

With some creations such as the sun and moon, the heavens and the earth and most animals and plants:one can readily appreciate the wisdom of their existence and their benefits to us.


With others, such as scorpions, snakes, lions,bears and crocodiles... the wisdom,benefit, and purpose is hidden,and one might even assume that their existence is evil.

 

But we should not attempt to declare what is good and evil in G-d's creations relying on our own understanding and intellect. For we should remember that our understanding and intellect are limited: and there are understandings and secrets that we can never fathom."

 

Fully understanding the  paradoxes and often distressing elements and  appearances of  His  creation is utterly beyond us. For  the Sufi: certainty is forever inaccessible, and  the  most we can hope  to reach is  the  state of "perplexity" (hayrah)—knowing that we know nothing.  One may, and  should, use one's reason and imagination with all one's strength in the attempted spiritual ascent, but ultimately (according to the  Egyptian Pietists) these pathways to knowledge need to be transformed and completed by intuition (dhawq) and a kind of experienced contemplative knowledge  that is infused (or withheld) by G-d Himself.  

Some  strains  of mysticism have  a tendency to focus  on cosmological theology: either trying  to fathom the "secrets" of  creation or  the  nature  of  the G-d Himself.  

Some (and even some specifically  Jewish mystics) study and practice  a kind  of  mapped-out theurgy that attempts  to produce almost magical results, albeit  for praiseworthy motives.  They seek a kind of  knowledge that is absorbingly intellectual and satisfies the human need to have  mysteries explained and  categorised.

Our religion's  most popular forms of Jewish Mysticism are derived from the esoteric works of the  proto-kabbalah and in the complex systems of the  Cordoveran and  Lurianic kabbalah of Safed.

But they are not  the only mystical path in Judaism's united  diversity: In the writings  of the  Rambam and  of the  Jewish-Sufis of the  Maimuni circle, there  is  no mention of the Sefer Yetzirah or even of the Sefirot as they were later to be understood in Safedian  kabbalah. This is not accidental but reflects a significant difference between the Judeo-Sufic path and  that of  many later forms  of  Jewish mysticism.

The Egyptian Hasidim of the Maimonidean circle provide us with an Alternative option in authentic Jewish mysticism — a   Path (Derech/Tariq) that is resolutely focussed on a simple and streamlined contemplative and  ascetic praxis rather than on metaphysical dogma, language manipulation, or intricate systems of cosmic-theology. 

It is  true  that there is  a  developed Suhrawardi-type ishraqi thread that runs  through the writings  of  the Jewish Sufis, and both the  Rambam and  his  son developed a mystical philosophy concerning the Created Light and Divine communication.  But the Judeo-Sufi descendants of  the  Rambam and  their circle were resolutely focused on contemplative and  devotional practice.   

In both Islamic  Sufism and  in the Jewish Sufism of the Egyptian Pietists, the  focus is  very much on the  soul's contemplative relationship with G-d.  It is  this very specific, plain-and-simple focus that we hope to develop in our present  day Tariqa Eliyahu.

The knowledge (gnosis/ma'rifa) that Sufis  seek is  not an attempt  to pin-down or  explain the  Divine, but to clear a path in the  mind and  heart to encounter Him there. 

It concerns  an intimate experience of "meeting" Him in solitude and contemplation (khalwa).

It isn’t telling G-d things only He can know,  or seeking to explain or manipulate His mysteries, so much as attempting to listen to the  Divine  Voice in our receptive contemplative prayer, in our encounters with the  "angels" that are sent  to us "at all times, evening, morning, and  noon" by Providence, whether they are in the  form of events, people  we meet, or texts  we stumble  across in prayer and  study.

 And in that attentive contemplative  listening we may, in some manner, come  to see that G-d creates both darkness and light according to his own mysterious but providential purposes. Free of duality, and distributed according to a  Will that is  far removed from human particularism or the  preferential concepts that humans  might employ.

That intuitive and somewhat wooly form of understanding/knowledge promotes humble "perplexity" as a route that can lead to a true form of unitive gnosis (wusla)—a meeting with an incomprehensible but ever-present G-d.

Nachman Davies

Safed

October 1st 2026

    


 

The Elijan Message of the Shofar


Wishing all who visit  this  page

 a Good and  Sweet New Year


oooOooo


The  great Shofar is  sounded

And  a still small voice is heard

 

The first  is merely the prelude to the second.

A physical sign to encourage

and mark a spiritual event.

The real “work” (avodah)  of the Ten Days

is listening to the true “Voice of the Shofar”,

the one which the ram’s horn merely heralds:

and that Voice often speaks clearest in the silence.

 

May we hear it in the silence between the multiple blasts

of Rosh Hashanah and the Final Blast after Yom Kippur.

 

but also..... in any silence in which we make space

for it to speak in the midst of our busy lives."


Nachman Davies 2010


Elul: Devekut and Unio Mystica

Jewish mystics, philosophers, and theologians have disagreed over the possibility of a kind of devekut that verges on unio mistica.

The Jewish-Sufis of the Maimuni circle in Mediaeval Egypt  had a distinctive take on this which is touched upon in this post from our sister website ( Jewish Sufis:Tariqa Eliyahu).



The phrase “Ani l'Dodi v’Dodi Li” displays an acronymic reference to the Month of Elul.

   In this  month of Elul—perhaps the  most ‘Sufi’ of Jewish months because of its history as a time  of retreat and meditation — the phrase offers us a springboard for contemplative reflection, and also presents us with a  potential recitation mantra for our private zhikr.

The imaginative possibility that this biblical text from the Song of Songs might refer to the  Sufi concepts of fana and baqa  was apparent to our Jewish-Sufi forebears. Furthermore, they  chose to emphasise such a reading of its hidden meaning within their unique system of Jewish mysticism. 

R.Abraham Ibn Abi'l-Rabi (d c.1223)—also known  as Abraham He-Hasid—was the  teacher and  colleague of R. Abraham ben HaRambam (1186-1237) and he made a clear reference to these two Sufic concepts in his Commentary on Shir HaShirim. 

In a fragment discovered and  translated by Prof. Paul Fenton, Rabbenu Abraham He-Hasid connects  the phrase to the aspirant’s need for  a mentor and guide (Shaykh/Murshid).   The essential nature of this  system of transmission and guidance was later stressed by both R. Abraham ben Ha Rambam (in the Kifaya) and R. Obadya Maimuni (1228-1265)  in his Hawdiyya.

Most significantly, for us  here in Tariqa Eliyahu HaNabi, R. Abraham He-Hasid also connects this pattern of transmission and guidance to the Bnei haNeviím: the biblical “Schools of the Prophets”  that so inspired Rabbenu Abraham ben Ha Rambam and his circle.

Rabbenu Abraham He-Hasid writes:

 

“The Sage (Solomon) at times refers to this vision and communion as "bride" and at others as "love", whereas the seeker (qasid) of this "bride" and "love" is called "beloved", as it is said

 "My beloved is mine... as an apple among the trees of the orchard, so is my beloved among the young men". (Cant, ii.3)

The plural is here mentioned as an allusion to those who choose a master in their quest for the goal, these are (2 Kings vi.i and elsewhere) "the disciples of the prophets." *1

 

It was the intention of the  Mediaeval Cairene Pietists  to revive the esoteric practices of the Bnei haNevi’im that they considered to have been temporarily lost to Judaism— yet fortuitously preserved by the Islamic Sufis. These practices were understood to be a path that led to spiritual maturity, human perfection, and the potential attainment of prophecy. Our Tariqa Eliyahu seeks to renew this specific Jewish-Sufi Path. 

ooOoo

 The Ani l'Dodi quotation appears in the  writings of R.David ben Joshua  Maimuni (1335-c1414) in connection with the concepts of the fana (annihilation) that leads to baqa (intimate union with the  Divine) 

Here the  debt to Islamic Sufism is explicit— both linguistically and philosophically—and  his writings indicate precisely how enthusiastically the concepts of fana and  baqa had been adopted by the Jewish-Sufis of his era.  Following his example,we regard them with the  same enthusiasm in our own Tariqa's spiritual practice.

   In an unattributed (but possibly autographic) commentary on Shir HaShirim ( from a manuscript that is nevertheless most certainly in R. David ben Joshua’s  own handwriting) we read:

“I am my Beloved’s and my Beloved is mine” (Cant. 6:3). We have already explained earlier (fol. 8b, Cant. 2:15) that whenever thou turnest to the love of an object and desirest all that that object desires, then it is as though [that object] had become thyself and thou hast become it, insofar as thou possessest it and thou art enslaved unto it. To be sure, thine annihilation (fana) within it is a mighty witness and indication that he belongs to thee and thou belongest to him.” *2

 

In  the Murshid, R. David ben Joshua Maimuni  writes:

“...during the final station, the soul sinks so deeply into love that it is no longer aware either of itself or of its love. Indeed, when the lover reaches the stage where he declares: ‘I am my beloved and my beloved is I’, he loses awareness of his own self due to the contemplation of the object of his love, which occupies him to such an extent that he perceives nothing except [that which he perceives] through his Beloved.”  *3

 

Paraphrasing  Mansour Al-Hallaj*4 — R. David Ben Joshua declares:

 


אנא מן אהוי ומן אהוי אנא

“I am my Beloved and my Beloved is I

...Oh Goal of my desire, 

in You I am freed from my Self.

You brought  me  so close to You

that it seemed as though You were I "  *5

 



Nachman Davies

Safed

Elul 1 2023

Revised Sept 16 2024

____________________

*1    Fenton, P. “A Mystical Commentary on the Song of Songs in the Hand of David Maimonides II,” (p.49) in Esoteric and Exoteric Aspects in Judeo-Arabic Culture, ed. B. Hary and H. Ben-Shammai (Leiden: Brill, 2006)

*2   Fenton,P ibid. p 42

*3  translated from: Fenton, P. Deux traités de mystique juive;Lagrasse: Éditions Verdier; 1987. (p.288-289)

*4     Mansour Al-Hallaj (c.858-922): a Persian Islamic Sufi saint and martyr who was a proponent of the concept that  annihilation of the  ego could lead to true unio mystica.  He was tortured  and  then executed  for stating this belief.

 *5    translated from  Fenton. P. Deux traites, p289

The Torah of The Heart: Shavuot 2026

The  three days of  Preparation and  Sanctification   before the  receipt of  the  Torah at Sinai are remembered in these days  before the  festival of Shavuot. On our  sister website, Jewish Sufis, you  can read the  reasons why members of Tariqa Eliyahu hold  these days in particular regard. The suggestion of  the Egyptian Hasidim (led by the  son of  the  Rambam)  is  that the Sinai retreat period  of communal hitbodedut (khalwa) is  actually a  part of  the  Sinai Revelation itself…. something  to be remembered and  celebrated by all Jews. 

This  essay is  a cross-posting from Tariqa Eliyahu's own website because it suggests that contemplating the  Torah of  the  Heart is an essential element of Jewish practice, and in Abraham ben HaRambam's own thought: the practice  of khalwa is  itself  the  means to renew the prophetic experience of Sinai  for our  entire nation.
oooOooo

We are well used to hearing  that the  Torah is composed of two strains: the Written Torah and  the Oral Torah but the  mystics of the  Jewish tradition have always  added a third strain which  concerns  the  hidden aspects  of  the  Torah. Some  have  called this the "Supernal Torah" and  some have called it the "Soul of  the  Torah". On this website  I have  written about this  subject several times (beginning in 2011) and in those  essays I  coined the  term "Torah of  the  Heart" to describe this third strain of revelation.

In 2024 I came  across certain texts (related  to the retreat period  at Sinai) written by Jewish-Sufi members  of  the mediaeval Egyptian Hasidic movement. I quickly realised with some excitement that they coincided and amplified the opinions I had expressed in 2011 and  this  short essay is an update to that original 2011 essay that will incorporate those specifically Jewish-Sufi insights.


oooOooo

The heart is our intuitive intellect. The soul is our very life-force. The Torah of the Heart is eternally given and when we receive it intentionally, it produces a connecting link between our intellect and our life-force. Our tangible experiences and our spiritual perceptions are thus bound up with our essential soul root, and from there, bound up with our G-d.

When we open up this channel we deepen our relationship with the Supernal Torah, because our obedience to the commands of the Torah would be incomplete if love and true internalisation were absent.

G-d speaks to all of us through the Torah She-bi’chtav (Written Torah) and the Torah She-ba’al Peh (Oral Torah). He also speaks to us in our own prayers and in our own private study and meditation. When we read the scriptures with pauses for meditation or when we meditate in silent prayer, we are hoping to access the Torah of the Heart.

We know how and when we are called to action as a nation and as individuals through the words of the Written and Oral Torah—but we each receive that Torah according to our own abilities and character, and for this reason we also need to receive and digest those ‘words’ personally in the Cave of the Heart, alone with our G-d.

Speaking of the text of the Torah, R. Avraham Joshua Heschel writes:

“In the hands of many peoples it becomes a book; in the life of Israel it remained a voice, a Torah within the heart. (Isaiah 51:7)” [1]

oooOooo

As you will see later in this essay, the mediaeval Jewish-Sufis of  the  Egyptian Hasidic movement suggest that this Torah of  the  Heart is  actually the third major element of the  Torah that was/is transmitted at Sinai. Alongside the  Oral Torah and  the  Written Torah, some  of  its authors posit what one  might  call a Contemplative Torah that is  accessed through meditation.

Something of  this  notion is  also to be  found  in the  Kabbalistic strain of Jewish mysticism that developed in Safed and  which later  fed into the European Hasidic movement. Before considering the mediaeval Jewish-Sufi perspective we might mention some  parallel  ideas from those later schools  of Jewish Mysticism.   

The Zohar[2]  is forcefully explicit:

“The stories of the Torah are its outer garments and whoever looks upon those garments as being the Torah itself, woe to that man...Referring to this, David said, Open my eye that I may behold wondrous things out of your Torah (Tehillim 119:18), for that which is under the garments is the real Torah.

The commandments of the Torah are called the “body” of the Torah... The fools of the world look on nothing save the garment... The wise, who worship the Most High King, those who stood at Mount Sinai, look only at the soul, It is the true Torah. In the world-to-come, they will look at the soul of the soul of the Torah.”[3]

The Zohar also tells us that each one of souls of Kehal Yisrael has “their own letter” in the Torah.[4] Interestingly, the Talmud Yerushalmi posits that this refers to letters in the primordial Torah written in black and white fire. [5]  The Arizal concurs with this view and adds that by contemplative activity one can actually access the way one’s soul root is linked to that letter/spiritual particle in the Supernal Torah in order to set up a channel of blessing on all worlds.[6]  

The Baal Shem Tov suggests that the Torah can be fractally or microcosmically presented,[7] and many sources emphasise that the Torah we see is not the whole story.[8]  In Kedushat Levi, R. Levi Yitzchak of Berditchev reminds us that:

“In fact, the entire Torah is G-d’s name. It originally contained combinations of letters and secret mysteries that ‘no eye has uncovered’ (Yoav 28:7). In its descent to our lowly world, the Torah must become clothed in a material garment.”[9]

The Kotzker Rebbe [10] tells us that the words of the Sh'ma are “laid on the surface of the heart” so that they may sink into those hearts which are truly receptive later on:

“And these words which I command thee this day, shall be upon thy heart.” The verse does not say: “in thy heart.” For there are times when the heart is shut. But the words lie upon the heart, and when the heart opens in holy hours, they sink deep down into it. [11]

This implies that the ‘words’ are only received when they are reflected upon and internalised personally—we may observe the letter of the Law, but we have not received it until we go beyond that letter to access its soul. This is done most especially in silent contemplative prayer.

I am reminded of a parallel example of this pre-condition for authenticity in the tale of the Baal Shem Tov’s encounter with the righteous and learned R.Dov Baer of Mezeritch. After asking the latter to recite holy words of Torah, the Baal Shem Tov declared Dov Baer’s recitation to be “correct” but without “true knowledge” because there was “no soul” in what he knew. [12]

oooOooo

Commenting on the Torah of  the  Heart on the  Jewish Contemplatives website  in 2011 I wrote:

" I can remember when reel to reel tape-recorders and cassette players were a miraculous novelty. I can remember the invention of the internet and the shock of realising (so comparatively recently) that we have wireless and satellite infotech connections of such power and speed that the entire Tanach, Talmud Bavli, Zohar and Shulchan Aruch can be transferred onto disk drive or pen drive and printed or viewed in any synagogue or home with sufficient resources to possess the equipment with which to open and view the files.

Only a few years ago, our world did not have the wonderful treasury of Sefaria.org, an ever growing (and free) online resource of Torah texts for all. These developments in human knowledge and capability have thus attained that which previous generations had thought to be  impossible or mere fantasy.

  We can watch and listen in amazement as many centuries of Torah commentary and study are transferred from PC to PC, from personal email to personal email, and from smartphone to pen drive—in seconds. And by the time you read this most of those miraculous inventions will almost certainly be superseded. Even as I write, there are forms of bio-implanted data that are being developed and perfected, and I suspect it will be years rather than decades before they are commonplace human accessories.

  Living in such an era, the traditional Jewish concepts concerning the transmission and the receiving of the Torah do not seem at all fanciful. Living in these times, we can easily comprehend the possibility that Moshe Rabbeinu may have received the ‘entire’ Torah in several intense download instalments,[13] and credibly— in less than a second. How much of this may have reached his conscious awareness, or how much of it he would have understood personally at the time of the revelation is, I think, another matter.

    I have no difficulty in imagining the truth concealed in the tale that we each knew that same Torah in the womb—and that an angel tapped us at birth so that we should forget its Light in order to spend all our lives looking for it.[14] I also have no difficulty in considering that it is possible that, in one moment, our G-d can infuse our brain or soul with his pure word in a way that is currently beyond our comprehension—But not beyond our receptive capability, and not beyond our experience.

The Sfas Emes[15] writes:

The essence of the Torah is G-d’s pure light shining to us through its Hebrew letters. They are spread throughout the universe, and the Jewish people are assigned to find them.[16]

  We all stood at Sinai. We all heard the Voice. The Words of the Living God have been laid upon our hearts, and they are a form of data which our intuitive hearts can access.

  The data which forms the ‘daat’ I am referring to here is a bit like having the Talmud and the Tanach on our soul’s hard drive.  Some of that data has been opened and viewed, but much of it may lie unopened in the  background.  There may be thousands of ‘words’ we have yet to read, or yet to understand—but they are there—and we can choose to ‘click on them’ to open their ‘folders’ if we want to.

  One might even say that just knowing that they are there inside us is an act of spiritual knowledge even though we may not realise it on an explicitly conscious level. The Torah which we had seen and known in the womb (and before) was not erased. It remains in our soul’s storage system for us to discover anew—letter by letter, word by word, line by line.

In Psalm 12 we read that:

Imrot HaShem amarot tehorot kesef

ba-alil la’aretz

m’zukak shivatayim

“The words of HaShem are pure words,like pure silver,

Clear to the world, refined seven times.”


Some commentators read ba-alil la-aretz as “in an earthly furnace”.

The Words of the Living G-d are pure.

Too pure for us.

They are, as it were, the derivational root of our words

Or the thoughts before and behind our thoughts.

 

The “pure words” of G-d are like refined silver.

In them there is no dross or clouding.

The only “earthly furnace” which can receive them at all

Is the crucible of our hearts.

And in that furnace they are not purified,

For they lack nothing and are perfect.

 

In the furnace of our hearts what happens

Is that our understanding of them is made possible...

They are made “clear to all the world”

-Our World.


Not by the work of explanation, analysis, or philosophy,

But by the three fires

Of Inspiration, of Deveykut, and of Spiritual Intimacy,

In which those “pure words” may be transmuted

Into earthly thoughts and actions.
The first is entirely the work of G-d;
The second is our own cry for contact with G-d or  our response to His call;
The  third is the activity arising from the union of our will
with the will of G-d.


These three "fires" are not necessarily  consecutive,
Nor do they always arise in that order-
-for a spark from one may ignite the others,
and they may just as easily burn simultaneously.
(From a Divine perspective they are all one anyway).


The “silver” flows down like a spiraling river
From the world where it had been pure
And goes through “seven” (many) changes
Before it can be comprehended in any way by us.

The process of refinement is (as it were) being reversed.
So that the pure word can be borne by man.

oooOooo

 

  We may be the type of people who need to discuss our lives with G-d frequently as though He were at our side. We may be the type of people who prefer to use the texts of prayers written by other people when we want to get closer to Him. We may be the kind of people who prefer to discuss His Words in the company of other humans. Or we may be the kind of people who can’t bear to do much of any of these activities, yet find we meet Him most intimately in acts of compassion and charity, in the ordinary events of an apparently secular life. All of these can be the way one hears and reads the Torah of the Heart.

But for the Contemplative Jew?

Well — we are those who need, more than anything, simply to turn the receiver on and let  G-d broadcast to us. We may not hear what He is saying in a way that is clear, but we can sense that, by being thoroughly attentive, we are doing what we were created to do. Standing or sitting or walking in contemplative prayer; praying the liturgy; performing ritual mitzvot—in our small way, we are attempting to both study and practice the Torah of the Heart.

  When we lay tefillin, the Pure Words of the Supernal Torah are transmuted, laid-up, and stored in the file-system of our heart and soul. The ritual is like a daily program update that renews and refreshes our communication with our G-d. Perhaps as ‘signs’, tefillin can speak to us more clearly than words. Perhaps these signs are closer to the Pure Words of G-d Himself than we realise. Perhaps they are laid-up (stored) in our heart and soul because it is only there—beyond the limitations of our intellect— that we can hold all of His Torah.

The Torah of the Heart is the medium whereby the Supernal Torah is revealed to the individual soul. The task of the contemplative is to make this explicit by intentionally running to receive it daily."

I believe  it  to be  highly significant that the Egyptian Hasidim viewed the  contemplative reception of  the  Torah of  the  Heart to be as important  as the  reception of  the Laws and  Statutes of  the  Written and Oral Torah.    R. Obadyah ben Avraham Maimuni calls it the Torah al-haqiqiyya[17] —the real and true essence of the Torah.

In the  following section we will now consider some  specifically Jewish-Sufi insights into the significance  of the  Torah of  the Heart/ Torah al-haqiqiyya that are all related  to the  three day retreat undertaken at Sinai by the  entire Jewish community.

oooOooo


THE COMMUNAL RETREAT AT SINAI

The Divine Revelation at Sinai was made to Moses but also—in some  form— to each and everyone present.  It is an event which describes the universal and  shared experience of prophecy (intimate communication with the  Divine) that is the   aim of  all  Jewish-Sufi contemplative  strivings.

 More than this, it is also  a part of  the entire Jewish Nation’s  journey to the  time when a  form of   prophecy will return to all Israel — at a time when  the  people of all nations “ will be  filled with the  knowledge of G-d as the  waters  cover the  sea.” [18]

The Egyptian Pietists believed that the path to such prophetic restoration was Khalwa (solitary retreat and contemplation). The form of  Khalwa that they (and all Sufis) promoted was  predominantly an act performed in solitude,by an individual, often involving intense seclusion away from society of  any kind.  Despite  this, it seems  to me that one of the forms of Khalwa they had in mind was  a communal re-presentation (an anamnesis-zikarah) of the unveiling (kashf) that all Israel experienced at Sinai.

In a recent  essay[19],  I have expressed the  view  that certain Jewish-Sufi texts indicate  that the Egyptian Haidim regarded the   retreat period  before the  giving of  the Torah to be (i) an essential element of the Sinai Revelation that had become  neglected and, as it  were, forgotten but which they hoped to recreate; and (ii) that this element  may well have  been the combined practice of  some  form of congregational khalwa-hitbodedut that involved dhikr-hazkarah. This theory is  the grounding for  our  Tariqa's insistence that the Cairene passages concerned denote a special form of isolation/contemplation that is unique within Jewish Mystical thought precisely because it is performed as a group.

The crucial phrase that is repeatedly used in Jewish-Sufi texts  of  the  period is "hakhanah v'kedushah", a term which describes (i) the "preparation and  sanctification" of  the biblical three day retreat and  possibly (ii) an arcane ritual-meditational practice that was taught by R.Avraham HeHasid and  other  leaders  of  the  movement.  This observation was first made by Professor Paul Fenton.  A suggestion that this was possibly a form of dhikr involving  the repetition of   Divine Names and  mantras has also been noted by  several other scholars.   

The  two principal texts which support these refer  to the scriptural account  of  the  community preparation/retreat before the  giving of  the  Torah, R. Abraham HeHasid (d.c.1223)[20] writes:

[T]he first verse alludes to the proximity of Revelation and to the unveiling of the external and internal sight and their illumination (basira qalbiyya). The second verse alludes to the prescription of the Laws and ordinances.

 Therefore keep these two sublime principles and forever observe them. The first is the state of vision and revelation.  Recall the "preparation and sanctification" [hakhanah we-qedushah] which I have indicated to you, which is the path that leads to Him and the details of which I have informed you, as well as the purifications which I have imparted to you, so that you may be elevated to this spiritual state.

 Bequeath and teach them to your descendants so that they will be continuously transmitted within your midst and thus the practices of this path shall be handed down from your forebears to your descendants. If each generation attains to the state of vision, then they will witness to the authenticity of the Torah which they possess and how it was revealed and accepted by their ancestors. Thus each generation shall inherit this Torah from Sinai and its appropriate spiritual state.[21]

In a footnote Professor Fenton quotes a related passage, but this  time   from R.Abraham ben Ha Rambam (1186-1237):

"The Revelation took place in order to familiarise you with the ways and means of Prophecy, so that the perfect ones among your descendants (i.e. the Jewish Sufis) may attain thereby that which you have attained. (Ex. xx.20). [22]

 In his  examination  of one of the  fragments by R. Abraham He Hasid, Professor Fenton writes:

Rabbi Abraham is of the opinion that in the days that preceded Revelation, Moses imparted to the Israelites an esoteric doctrine whereby they might attain to prophecy. Details of this doctrine were not disclosed by Scripture, on account of their subtlety, but are alluded to in the "sanctification" that the Israelites underwent. Elsewhere, Abraham Maimonides intimates that this external and internal purification consisted in "inward contemplation" (khalwa batina).[23]

Thus, the preparation for  Revelation is clearly presented as a communal khalwa retreat.

One  way of interpreting  the text from Abraham He  Hasid is  to underline his insistence that khalwa, signifying  the  interiorisation of  the  Supernal Torah during contemplation is  a crucial part of the Sinaitical legacy that must be  preserved and imparted throughout  the  generations.  

R.Avraham ben HaRambam distinguishes three levels of Torah study: the reflective, the meditative, and the contemplative. The  progressive  ascending order presented  in that path is  no accident,  and he suggests that the contemplative way is the one followed by an 'Intimate Servant of G-d' who finds “bliss in his Maker as His sublime lights enter him” as he begins to perceive the “profound bonds with G-d that are generated by the intellect and the Torah”.[24]   For  him, the Torah is relationship as well as law.

We are  used to hearing  of  the  significance  of the minyan when considering  the  efficacy of community tefilla.  But the notion that  khalwa-hitbodedut can be a  communal and  congregational event  is a unique element that is (I believe) to be  found  only in the  Jewish-Sufi  system. I believe  it is derived from Abraham HeHasid's interpretation of the  communal retreat at Sinai.

In classical Islamic Sufism, the  term  khalwat dar anjuman describes the  state of shiviti consciousness and absorption into the  contemplation of the  Divine that persists even when the devotee is amongst a crowd.  It usually denotes a high  state of individual interior detachment from the  created world and  its  creatures. It is almost exclusively presented as an activity in a  single individual's consciousness.

   We might give  a specifically  Jewish inflection to the concept  of khalwat dar anjuman  by relating it to  the Sinai experience :  

We can be alone but  simultaneously united with the other seekers in a silent meditative congregation: All of us  together, yet each of us  alone — with both the individual and the  community engaged in  communal preparation for an intimate meeting with G-d  Himself.  Just as at Sinai.

This idea  is  the generative  source  of Tariqa Eliyahu's weekly Silent  Meditation meetings which consist of congregational khalwa-hitbodedut and dhikr-hazkarah.  They are a  deliberate re-enactment of  the hakhanah v'kedushah of Sinai.

Whether you  are  a  member of  our  Tariqa or simply a contemplative  Jew reading  this essay, as we approach the  Festival of  Shavuot, we hope  you will join us  as a solitary meditator  united  with us  in spirit during this  special week of  "preparation".

 

Nachman Davies

Safed

May 17th 2026



 

[1] Joel 3:1

[3] Abraham ibn Abi’l-Rabi’ was known as Abraham HeHasid (the  term “Hasid”signifying “Sufi”in his time and  location). The  fact that the  son of Moses Maimonides (Abraham ben HaRambam)  was also known as  “Abraham Ha Hasid” caused some confusion in previous  centuries  over authorial identities, confusion  that has since been resolved.

[4] Fenton P: Some Judaeo-Arabic Fragments by Rabbi Abraham he-Ḥasīd, the Jewish Sufi, in  JSS 26 (1981),  page 66

[5] Fenton P: Some Judaeo-Arabic Fragments… page 66

[6] Fenton. P:  Some Judaeo-Arabic Fragments …, page 57

[7] ‘Sefer HaMaspik’ Chapter 1, Rav.Avraham ben HaRambam, trans R' Yaakov Wincelberg in ‘The Guide to Serving G-d’ page 13,( Feldheim,Jerusalem/New York,2008)


[8] Abraham Joshua Heschel in A Philosophy of Judaism p275; (Farrar Straus and Giroux,New York,1955)

[9] I rarely quote the Zohar or  other texts favuored by the  Safed School but the  selection  of texts that I quote  in this section of  the  essay are included here because they bear a  remarkable  resemblance to certain passages in  R.Obadyah Maimuni's Treatise of  the  Pool and R. David ben Joshua's Murshid. (Remarkable  because neither they  nor  the Jewish-Sufi movement generally make any significant mention of  the  Zohar or   similar  kabbalistic texts from before or  after the  mediaeval era.)

[10] Zohar 3:152a

[11] Zohar Chadash, Shir HaShirim 74d

[12] Talmud Yerushalmi, Shekalim 6:1, Midrash Tanchuma (Bereshit 1)

[13] This idea is expounded at length by the Shelah (R. Isaiah Horowitz 1555-1630) in Shnei Luchos HaBris.

[14] Ben Poras Yosef 23b states that the entire Torah is included in every single word. Other sources cite the Baal Shem Tov as saying that the entire Torah is present in a single one of its letters.

[15] Notably Tikkunei Zohar 21b. R. Chaim Vital (1543-1620) conceptualises the facets of the Torah as “PaRDeS” (pshat-remez-drush-sod).

[16] In Kedushas Levi: Parashas Beshallach. The idea is also to be found in the Zohar at Zohar II:87a, and III:98b as well as in the Ramban’s “Introduction” to his Torah Commentary.

[17] R.Menachem Mendel of Kotzk (1787-1859)

[18] ‘Tales of the Hasidim’ vol 2, Martin Buber, trans. Olga Marx, page 278, ( Schocken Books Inc,New York, 1949)

[19] See ‘Tales of the Hasidim’ vol 1, Martin Buber, trans. Olga Marx, page 99, (Schocken Books Inc, New York, 1949)

[20] See Gittin 60a-b. see also Berachot 21b

[21]  in Midrash Nidda 30b

[22]  R. Yehuda Aryeh Leib Alter of Ger (1847-1905)

[23] Translated by Moshe A.Braun in ‘The Sfas Emes’, page 70 (Jason Aronson inc, Northvale, 1998)

[24] Fenton, P: The Treatise of the Pool: Al-Maqala al-Hawdiyya. London, Octagon Press, 1981.  Page 10